How we check our numbers

Every figure we publish is derived from CMS cost report worksheet coordinates. A wrong coordinate produces a number that looks perfectly reasonable, so we reconcile against hospitals whose audited figures are independently available and we publish the result — including the metrics that fail.

0 of 3 metrics currently pass reconciliation. Metrics that do not pass are labelled unverified everywhere they appear, including in the API response.

MetricVerdictPassedRate
net_incomeMIXED1/1010%
net_patient_revenueMIXED14/3342%
total_operating_expensesMIXED5/2619%

What we compare against

70 figures across 33 hospital-years at 28 hospitals (48 in AL, 17 in WA, 4 in NY, 1 in FL), read off audited financial statements: state-filed audits for government hospital authorities, and continuing-disclosure filings on EMMA for bond-issuing non-profits. Every figure is transcribed by hand from a named document and stored with a citation to that document and page; a figure we could not source is left blank rather than estimated. Tolerance is 0.5% for money, exact for counts.

The sample is deliberately drawn from hospitals that publish accounts at all — non-profits, which file an IRS Form 990, and government authorities, which are audited by their state. Proprietary hospitals publish neither and cannot be checked this way, so nothing here demonstrates that a for-profit chain fills the same cost-report lines the same way.

What reconciliation found

What we do not do

We do not interpolate. We do not carry a figure forward from a prior year. A metric whose inputs are missing is returned as null, never as zero. Where a provider filed an amended cost report we use the latest filing and say so.